tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4058766287077382431.post3605273032291834467..comments2024-03-23T04:01:39.348-04:00Comments on Understanding Society: João Ohara's new synthesis of the philosophy of historyDan Littlehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15953897221283103880noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4058766287077382431.post-10302350721853406542022-12-20T08:47:49.131-05:002022-12-20T08:47:49.131-05:00The introduction ist super;) The introduction ist super;) Hermann Millerhttps://buerostuhl-testsieger.de/herman-miller-aeron-buerostuhl-test/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4058766287077382431.post-4527075687806975032022-10-27T07:53:23.497-04:002022-10-27T07:53:23.497-04:00Insofar as an awful lot of persons, places and thi...Insofar as an awful lot of persons, places and things comprise the idea of history, an open-ended discussion of that seems mandatory. I have been intrigued with the preponderance of faiths and beliefs, worldwide, not because of any quest for truth, but because of parochial interpretations of it which appear to account for how it is viewed differently from place to place. Philosophy and religion have commonality. I find this fascinating. Some defenders of faith have been annoyed by my queries and propositions. So I leave them alone with their defenses. History is a continuum of reality and abstraction, physics and metaphysics. It all fits together and how it is seen depends on points of view. Sounds like this thinker has covered that in much more than a nutshell.Paul D. Van Pelthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13508874039164282696noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4058766287077382431.post-534588397147711022022-10-27T03:40:26.479-04:002022-10-27T03:40:26.479-04:00Thanks for your introduction. The "History an...Thanks for your introduction. The "History and Philosophy of History" is inspiring. I believe that a difference between philosophers of social sciences/history and philsophers of natural science is related to their interactions with social sicentists/historians and natural scientists. Practicing sociologists prefer to reflect on their practices by developing the philosophy of social sciences and they listen to their related philosophy. How about natural science? What are contributions of philosophy of natural science to it? I thinking that the comparsion can help Aviezer Tucker and João Ohara to admit that there exists a looping effect between philosophy and practices in social sciences/history.Yufan Sunhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09526985100875586089noreply@blogger.com