tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4058766287077382431.post4228499742302614628..comments2024-03-23T04:01:39.348-04:00Comments on Understanding Society: The human sciencesDan Littlehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15953897221283103880noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4058766287077382431.post-81777879317378295432022-09-02T06:55:04.327-04:002022-09-02T06:55:04.327-04:00Hi,
I found this blog post quite useful while res...Hi,<br /><br />I found this blog post quite useful while researching on the use of hermeneutics in literary studies, and evolving it as a method for interpreting texts, phenomenologically.<br />The basics regarding 'human sciences' is present in a nutshell.The Lyrical Selfhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13059852303548581794noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4058766287077382431.post-71045055724133172902013-02-04T15:31:47.263-05:002013-02-04T15:31:47.263-05:00This is a fascinating account of human science and...This is a fascinating account of human science and at odds in many ways with how we deliver the science to our clients. In particular your second to last paragraph indicates a foreign approach to what we believe constitutes good science. Daniel I look forward to you finding the time to chat with me about what is good Human Science. Dawn www.igorscience.com or our blog at www.igorscience.orgAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4058766287077382431.post-54762845762986093882013-01-05T13:42:16.914-05:002013-01-05T13:42:16.914-05:00I think the current and lasting impact of Dilthey ...I think the current and lasting impact of Dilthey et al is the post-positivism hermeneutic recognition that all use of data involves interpretation even though the natural sciences can conveniently ignore this understanding in ost instances. The positivist period detour that I'm familiar with in psychology can be recognized and included within a wider hermeneutic understanding so that the ideas of Dilthey today can be post-positivist instead of anti-positivist. Howard Johnsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09426998835138855839noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4058766287077382431.post-86416737035895971322013-01-04T17:12:36.768-05:002013-01-04T17:12:36.768-05:00Anon, I don't think contemporary economists wo...Anon, I don't think contemporary economists would accept this label, though the classical political economists would have. Some economists would be comfortable with either behavioral or social science as a rubric.Dan Littlehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15953897221283103880noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4058766287077382431.post-45507439389671332172013-01-04T11:22:23.324-05:002013-01-04T11:22:23.324-05:00So, based on the placement of Mill and Marshall, i...So, based on the placement of Mill and Marshall, is economics a moral science?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4058766287077382431.post-68075044420374425412013-01-04T06:46:54.839-05:002013-01-04T06:46:54.839-05:00I'm not sure if translating Geisteswissenschaf...I'm not sure if translating Geisteswissenschaften as human sciences is a good translation. Translated literally it would be spirit science.<br /><br />Dilthey is of interest and he uses the term Geisteswissenschaften, but I think more important at least when it comes to Weber are Windelband and Rickert. Rickert doesn't use the term Geisteswissenschaften but instead uses the term Kulturwissenschaften, which can be rather literally translated as cultural studies/science. So that would open up another connection altogether.tulihttp://systempunkte.orgnoreply@blogger.com